
A frustrating paradox is commonly observable in modern organizations: teams are working harder and longer hours than ever before, yet, despite technological advancements, real strategic progress often fails to occur. This phenomenon - stagnation despite considerable effort - can be illustrated with a powerful metaphor, the "manual work treadmill".
To understand this metaphor, we first need to define what a manual treadmill is. Unlike motorized treadmills, manual ones do not require electricity. The belt is driven solely by the user’s effort. Using a manual treadmill demands up to 30% more energy to achieve the same speed as an electric model.
This analogy effectively reflects the daily operations of many organizations. The manual treadmill symbolizes an organizational state in which the company expends all its energy and resources to address low-value, reactive workloads created by itself.
The analogy mentioned earlier can be measured quantitatively. A considerable portion of modern corporate activities consumes vast amounts of energy but contributes little to the organization’s overall performance.
These activities include low-value tasks, often referred to as “work about work.” This encompasses activities like communicating about tasks, attending status meetings, searching for documents and information, seeking approvals, and managing frequently changing priorities. Such tasks can occupy up to 60% of work time.
Continuous interruptions during work pose additional challenges, making it hard for employees to concentrate. This category also includes repetitive manual tasks, which can account for up to 30% of work time.
As a result, these activities lead to significant efficiency losses, which are also reflected in the company's overall costs.
Companies mostly get trapped in this inefficient, energy-wasting operational structure due to complex psychological and cultural phenomena.
Research from Columbia Business School indicates that the primary status symbol of our time is "conspicuous busyness."
When a person is always busy, works overtime, and fills their calendar, it implies that they are desirable in the job market and possess valuable skills. Thus, visibly engaging in constant activity serves as evidence of an individual's worth.
The daily lives of managers and key personnel often involve reacting to unexpected problems, which distracts them from strategic planning and value-creating activities.
Although this reactive approach is inefficient, it can be psychologically rewarding. The "hero" who tackles a sudden issue often receives praise from colleagues and leadership. In contrast, proactive tasks, such as automating a process, tend to go unnoticed.
The underlying issue is that organizations tend to reward reactive firefighting behavior rather than fostering a proactive problem-solving culture. This creates a self-sustaining cycle: firefighting consumes resources and leaves little time for preventive measures.
When an organization focuses all its energy on routine tasks, it significantly undermines its capacity for strategic planning. As a result, the company struggles to prepare for the future since maintaining the status quo consumes all of its resources.
Additionally, many leaders mistakenly equate operational and tactical work with strategic, results-driven tasks. They often believe they are engaging in strategic work while actually spending most of their time on day-to-day operations.
Furthermore, a lack of awareness among team members can hinder progress. Research indicates that a substantial portion of employees are not informed about the company's strategy and direction.
The lack of strategic capacity eventually encounters a physical limit - an organization reaches a stage where operations reliant on manual processes can no longer sustain further growth, leading to bottlenecks.
When faced with these bottlenecks, leaders often instinctively respond by attempting to accelerate processes, typically through purchasing new equipment or hiring additional staff.
However, breaking free from the cycle of manual inefficiencies is not about speeding up existing processes - rather, it requires rethinking and optimizing them.
Modern organizations often find themselves on the "manual work treadmill," where energy is wasted on low-value, reactive tasks, preventing real progress from being made.
To avoid getting stuck on this treadmill, the first step is to identify and automate low-value but frequently occurring tasks. This will free up your team’s capacity to focus on strategic work. It’s also essential to build a corporate culture that rewards proactive, efficiency-enhancing initiatives rather than merely reacting to immediate problems.
Ensure that all employees are familiar with the corporate strategy so that everyone understands the common direction. It’s important to consciously align daily work with long-term goals.
By doing this, an organization can work not just harder, but smarter, leading to genuine growth.