Want to learn how to optimize your processes?
Discover our solutions for retail companies
In short: A retail buyer's job title says "Strategic Buyer," but the daily reality in Hungary and the CEE region is often 70-80% firefighting and admin work: chasing supplier price-increase demands, reconciling spreadsheets by hand, hunting for last year's contract, and absorbing the blame when shelves run empty. This article walks through where that time actually goes — price pressure, information asymmetry with suppliers, stock-out risk, maverick spending, and a tightening sustainability compliance load — and makes the case that the fix isn't more effort, but real-time data and automation that free up time for the strategic work the role was meant to be.
At 7:30 AM, the first supplier email of the day is already waiting: "Dear Partner, we regret to inform you that due to rising raw material costs, we are forced to implement an 8% price increase..."
For a lot of retail buyers in Hungary and the CEE region, this is simply how the day starts.
Your job description says you're a "Strategic Buyer." You optimize categories, build long-term supplier relationships, and lead innovative cost-saving initiatives. That might be true in theory, but in reality, you spend 70-80% of your time putting out fires and drowning in repetitive admin work.
While you were studying complex sourcing strategies at university, you're now writing Excel macros at 7 PM to pull together an RFP that should have been sent out yesterday. Instead of being a "strategic partner," you've become an administrative executor, constantly running from one crisis to the next.
Hungarian inflation eased to a 4.4% average for 2025, but the psychological impact on negotiations is far greater than the headline number suggests. Every single one of your suppliers feels justified in demanding a price increase — and often, they're right. The problem is, while they can easily pass their rising costs on to you, you can't do the same.
Hungarian consumers are brutally price-sensitive. In PwC's Voice of the Consumer research for the CEE region, 68% of consumers say they're worried about inflation, and 64% name it among their top three concerns — a level of financial pressure that shows up directly at the negotiating table. What does this mean for you? Every supplier negotiation is a battle for your company's profit margin.
The pressure comes from every direction at once: suppliers pushing for an 8% increase or threatening not to deliver, management capping what they'll accept at 2%, and customers ready to walk to the discount supermarket the moment prices move.
Let's talk about what nobody likes to talk about: the time-consuming administrative work that eats the day. A typical day looks something like this.
8:00–10:00 AM: merging spreadsheets from different departments to prepare for the weekly tender. Everyone sends their data in a different format, uses a different currency, and someone, once again, forgot to fill in the forecasted quantities.
10:00 AM–12:00 PM: trying to locate last year's contract with this same supplier in SAP — and it's not where it's supposed to be. Half an hour later, it turns up on a colleague's local drive in a file named CONTRACT_FINAL_v2_FINAL_REVISED.docx.
1:00–3:00 PM: preparing an RFP in Excel, without any e-sourcing tools, manually copying and pasting supplier bids because there's no system to automate it.
3:00–5:00 PM: answering internal emails where everyone needs an urgent procurement request that was "due yesterday."
Strategic sourcing, supplier innovation, category optimization — none of it fits into a day that looks like this.
"Our raw material costs have gone up," the supplier says. Have they really? By how much? Why? Is there market data to back that up?
The honest answer is usually that you don't know. Without access to real-time commodity prices, should-cost models, or even a simple benchmark database, you're negotiating blind — while the supplier knows exactly what they're charging your competitors for the same product. That's a weak negotiating position, and it costs real savings.
A representative example of how this plays out: a major FMCG supplier requests a 12% price increase, citing rising energy costs — while broader energy prices are actually falling at the time. Without the tools to verify that instantly and push back with data, the buyer is left to haggle, bluff, or accept the increase.
The pandemic-era shortages made procurement risk visible in a way it rarely is otherwise. The pandemic is over, but the underlying supply chain uncertainty hasn't gone anywhere — geopolitical disruption, shipping bottlenecks, and manufacturing delays can all interrupt a supply chain with little warning.
And when shelves are empty, procurement takes the blame. Without an early warning system or real-time tracking, problems are often only visible once they've already become urgent — leaving little room for anything but a scramble to call alternative suppliers.
Marketing places a direct order with their "old, trusted" supplier — at three times the price negotiated in the framework agreement. Sales bypasses the procurement process for an "urgent" need. Logistics "just quickly" buys something because there was "no time" for the proper procedure.
This isn't just wasted money. It's a compliance risk, a loss of control, and — for the buyer who spent weeks negotiating a favorable contract that nobody used — a personal frustration that's hard to shake.
New EU regulations are shifting from recommendation to binding requirement, and the compliance burden is real even where deadlines have moved. CSRD sustainability reporting obligations are already being phased in for large companies. The EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) — which would require proof that supply chains, including a supplier's factory abroad, are deforestation- and exploitation-risk-free — has been postponed twice and now applies to large and medium operators from December 30, 2026, with small and micro operators given until mid-2027. The delay buys time, but it doesn't remove the underlying question: how do you document a carbon footprint or a supplier's labor practices when you can barely get consistent data from your tier-1 suppliers today?
And for some local flavor: while preparing for EU environmental standards, Hungarian buyers also navigate the EU's highest standard VAT rate, at 27%, along with unpredictable sector-specific taxes.
When everything runs smoothly, no one notices. When something goes wrong, all fingers point at the buyer. Management still tends to see procurement as a cost center, not a strategic function — savings get credited to "teamwork," while a stock-out gets called "procurement's fault." That asymmetry isn't just frustrating; over time, it becomes a career dead-end.
Picture starting the day with a dashboard showing real-time supply chain risk, rather than an inbox of surprises. AI-supported price analysis that tells you in seconds whether a supplier's price-increase claim holds up against market data. An RFP process that runs in minutes instead of a full afternoon. Every contract and every piece of supplier data in one place, instantly accessible. An early-warning system that flags a potential supply issue days before it becomes a crisis.
None of this removes the underlying pressures — inflation, supplier leverage, regulatory complexity. What it changes is how much of the day goes to fighting fires versus doing the strategic work the role exists for.
Constant firefighting doesn't just cost the company money. It costs the person doing the job — going home most evenings knowing the day was spent reacting rather than doing the strategic work the role was meant to involve. The overtime, the stress, the constant low-grade alert state, isn't sustainable indefinitely.
Consider what it would mean to finally have time for the category strategy that's been sitting on the back burner for months, to bring data-backed proposals into the management meeting instead of gut calls, to stop taking a supplier's price-increase claim on faith, or simply to leave at a reasonable hour without another few hours of spreadsheet work waiting.
Procurement in Hungarian and CEE retail is at something of a crossroads: stay in reactive firefighting mode, or move toward genuine digital transformation. Inflation, geopolitical uncertainty, and supply chain volatility aren't going away — they're part of the operating environment now. What can change is how the function handles them.
The real questions worth sitting with are practical ones: how sustainable is the current pace, how much talent burns out under it, and how many savings opportunities quietly disappear into manual processes every month.
If parts of this felt familiar, that's not a coincidence — most retail procurement peers in the region are facing the same pressures.
Three things worth doing this week: for a few days, track how much time actually goes to manual admin versus strategic work; estimate how much in savings was likely missed last month due to a lack of information; and honestly ask whether this is still the job in five years if nothing changes.
Strategic procurement isn't a distant ideal — it's achievable with the right tools and a willingness to step out of the firefighting cycle. The more useful question isn't whether there's time to make that change. It's whether there's a way to afford not to.
Procurement Software Evaluation Checklist - Detailed checklist to evaluate your software opportunities. The checklist includes:
Download the procurement software evaluation checklist here.
1. Why do retail buyers spend so much time on admin instead of strategic work?
Because the underlying processes — reconciling spreadsheets, tracking down contracts, manually building RFPs — are largely manual, and manual work expands to fill the time available. Without centralized data and automated workflows, even simple tasks (finding last year's contract, comparing supplier bids) become time sinks that crowd out category strategy and supplier development.
2. How can a buyer push back on a supplier's price-increase claim?
The strongest position comes from data: real-time or benchmarked commodity and market pricing that lets you check a supplier's stated justification (like rising energy costs) against actual market movement. Without that, buyers are negotiating on trust rather than evidence, which structurally favors the supplier.
3. What is the EUDR, and does it apply now?
The EU Deforestation Regulation requires proof that certain commodities and their derived products haven't caused deforestation. It's been postponed twice; large and medium operators must comply by December 30, 2026, and small and micro operators by mid-2027. It isn't yet in force, but the data and traceability groundwork it requires takes time to build, so early preparation still matters.
4. What is "maverick spending" and why is it hard to stop?
It's purchasing that bypasses the negotiated procurement process — a department ordering directly from a familiar supplier at a worse price, for example. It's hard to stop because it usually happens under time pressure, framed as an exception, and without a system that would flag or block it automatically.
5. What's a realistic first step toward reducing the firefighting cycle?
Start by measuring it: track for a week how time actually splits between admin and strategic work, and estimate the savings likely missed due to poor information. That data is usually the strongest case for prioritizing a single high-friction process — like RFP creation or contract retrieval — as a first place to automate.
.png)